Bayo Onanuga, Extraordinary Consultant to President Bola Tinubu on Data and Procedure, has approached the PDP and Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, its official competitor, to stop their missions of backbiting and shakedown against the legal executive.
Onanuga settled on the decision in an explanation on Monday in Abuja while responding to Atiku’s new claims against the nation’s legal executive .
“In discrete articulations, the PDP and the representative of Atiku Abubakar, its crushed official up-and-comer in Feb. 25 official political decision, tossed mindfulness to the breezes.
“They attacked the trustworthiness of the legal executive and made wild and derogatory charges against President Bola Tinubu.
“Directly following the unfortunate run of a few chosen legislative leaders of the party at the allure court, the PDP and previous VP and his representative have become obviously frantic to drape their hardships on President Tinubu and the legal executive, a significant arm of government in Nigeria.”
He added that in accusing others, Atiku and his party neglected to determine if they had done any spirit looking through prior to opening up to the world about their profound, presumptive and careless charges.
He encouraged Nigerians to ignore the malignant charges by the PDP and its up-and-comer that Tinubu while he was Legislative leader of Lagos State, quieted the resistance and debased the legal executive.
He likewise requested that the public negligence the claim that Tinubu was wanting to foist a one-party state on the nation by delegating followers as Inhabitant Constituent Chiefs (RECs).
Onanuga focused on that Tinubu was a leftist to the center who had never impeded the judgment of the legal executive.
“We had seen how under his supervision, the PDP lead representative in Osun crushed the APC at the High Court.
“Additionally, the PDP lead representative in Bauchi likewise won his case in the Allure Court, beating the APC.
“President Tinubu is likewise not intending to force a one-party state as Atiku hosts sequentially claimed and his get-together and representative have now parroted.
“These charges are purposely focused on superfluously warming up the commonwealth and causing disappointment in our country. They exist just in the creative mind of the PDP and the previous VP,” Onanuga said.
He added that not at all like Atiku Abubakar, President Tinubu’s record as a liberal second to none and a solid promoter of law and order had been universally recognize
As per Onanuga, Tinubu’s help out as lead representative which saw goliath steps in different features, is liable for the strength of his political design in Lagos State and not by any undemocratic direct.
“Conversely, it is on record that Atiku Abubakar as of late admitted about the appointive heist his party executed in the South-West in 2003 which Tinubu made due out of the six legislative leaders of the ancient Coalition for A majority rules government.
“Atiku and PDP are currently falsely sounding the alarm over the Allure Court decisions on governorship surveys in Level, Zamfara and Nasarawa States.
“We hurry to ask the previous VP where he was in 2019 when the court rejected the APC in Zamfara and granted every one of the positions won by the APC to PDP,” he said.
Onanuga pondered where Atiku was, additionally in 2019 when in Streams, the court prevented APC from handling any up-and-comer in both the Governorship and State Place of Get together races.
He further pondered where Atiku and the PDP were in 2019 when just before the swearing-in of Bayelsa Lead representative choose, David Lyon, the High Court gave the triumph of the APC to the up-and-comer of the PDP, Gov. Douye Diri.
“Atiku and PDP then relished every one of these court-gave prizes as sweet triumphs for PDP and praised the courts as defenders of a vote based system.
“Now that similar courts are repealing PDP triumphs, in view of the outright infringement of the law by the rebellious party, the party is mudslinging the legal executive and President Tinubu.
“Yet again we entreat Atiku and PDP to stop their missions of backbiting and shakedown against the legal executive and the respectable appointed authorities and judges.
“Decisions depend on regulation and proof. In political decision appeal cases, they depend on the Electing Act and the Constitution, not on feelings and feelings,” Onanuga pushed.
He added that it was untrustworthy and a damage to our country for the resistance, subsequent to neglecting to notice the letters and spirits of the law, to now pivot to destroy a significant arm of government.
